I think all of the models discussed could be used in the
classroom. Argument driven inquiry requires a little more than some of these
models can offer alone but in conjunction I think they all hold value. Critical
event analysis as well as cause and effect analysis are very well suited to
ADI. They require you to pick a topic and derive an explanation which is very
well suited for ADI. These models require the students to develop an argument
and support it with facts. This could be used in almost any biology context.
Every single lab the students will do requires them to perform an experiment
and draw conclusions. Both of these models fit very well into this idea. A
possible ADI question could be how CO2 emissions effect global warming. The students
would do research to understand the effects of CO2 on the atmosphere. Functional
analysis is also what biologists use every day so it stands to reason that it
would fit in well with ADI. A possible question used in the classroom could be about
almost any topic. I could ask what function rainfall plays in agriculture and
students could learn how water amount affects plant growth and also how rainfall
plays a functional role in any ecosystem. Students could model plant growth or
animal population studies during a drought or heavy rain season. Information
provided would be data about rainfall and population studies and the students
could extrapolate what effects reduced food sources have on a population. Whether
the data is real or hypothesized the students could draw conclusions based on
research about the ecosystem and species in question.
No comments:
Post a Comment