While reading Hestenes, I had each of the NGSS practices up
to refer back to throughout the article. The first NGSS practice, asking
questions and defining problems, seemed to be important to Hestenes. He kept
making a point that I definitely agree with,
“one cannot discover what one cannot conceive.” He goes on to say kids
believe their job is to memorize facts and that this explains why so many
students have a tough time grasping modeling. I believe this fits in with the
first practice because in order for students to learn, they need to be asking
questions. Hestenes does make a point to say that many students have
misconceptions bout modeling, and I believe asking questions is the best way to
break down the learning barriers. The second practice, developing and using
models, was essentially the whole point of Hestenes’ article, as he believes
the main objective of science instruction should be to teach modeling. Even one
of the several general principles of experimental design is developing a model
for phenomena from theory, which goes to show the importance of this practice.
Planning and carrying out investigations was touched upon in
his explanation of experimental games. The objective of these games is to test
and validate models. The experimental games have two major components: design
and interpretation of data and the collection and interpretation of data, which
leads to the fourth NGSS practice, analyzing and interpreting data. Hestenes
talks about this practice when he refers to Zeroth law and other physical laws
that are involved in increasing range and precision of kinetical
measurements. He explains how data are
meaningful only to the extent that they are related to some conceptual model,
and that the data should relate to some model or process to be useful. Using
mathematics and computational thinking was touched on briefly. With the
discussion of Newton's discovery of the binomial theorem as good index of his
growing analytical and pattern recognition skills, and explaining that Newton
was the first to apply calculus to practical problems, there was an evident
importance of the meshing of mathematics and science.
The sixth NGSS practice, constructing explanations and
designing solutions, was brought up when talking about how student attention
should be directed at models and processes where patterns are found. I interpret
this as actively construction explanation is essential to the model process and
requires the utmost control of student attention. For engaging in argument from
evidence
, Hestenes talked about how reflective thinking is essential for
mastering technical skills. He made a point to say how practice is not enough.
Lastly, for obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information, Hestenes
talked about deployment games, which involve matching of models to empirical
phenomena and data. Often a given model has already has already been validated
in some empirical domain so the model is expected to account for new data.
Using obtained information, evaluating it by seeing what can be added to add
validation and communicating new findings can ultimately lead to new knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment